They further argue that the numerous companies that market internationally, especially to NATO rivals, demand more attention from “irresponsible expanders” and policymakers.
These include Celbright, an Israeli company that manufactures phone hacking and forensic equipment and sells it to countries around the world, including the United States, Russia and China. The company has already faced significant shocks because, for example, its role in time Crackdown in China Hong Kong and the discovery that its technology is being used by a Bangladeshi.Death party.”
“When these organizations begin to sell their wares to both NATO members and adversaries,” the report said, “it should provoke national security concerns by all consumers.”
According to the report, trade is growing globally, with 75% of companies selling cyber surveillance and intrusion products outside their own continents. Winona December, a co-author of the Atlantic Council’s Cyber Statecraft Initiative, argues that such sales indicate potential problems with oversight.
“Most of these companies don’t seem to have the desire to self-regulate,” he says.
By identifying such organizations as “irresponsible proliferators,” DeSombre hopes to encourage lawmakers around the world to target some companies for greater control.
“When these organizations start selling their wares to both NATO members and adversaries, it raises national security concerns by all consumers.”
Governments have recently taken steps toward some form of control. The EU adopted strict rules Surveillance technology last year with the goal of increasing the transparency of the industry. And the United States has made laws in the last month Strict New licensing rules for the sale of penetration equipment. The infamous Israeli spyware company NSO Group was one of several companies added to a U.S. blacklist because of allegations that the spyware it supplied to foreign governments was then maliciously used to target government officials, journalists, businessmen, staff, academics and embassy staff. The NSO has consistently denied injustice and Argued That it strictly investigates abuse and shuts down offensive customers.
Nevertheless, one of the authors of the report says that it is important to realize the true scale of what is happening.
“The most basic thing in this paper is that we’re working on an industry,” said Johan Ole Willers, a fellow at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs (NUPI) Center for Cyber Security Studies. “This is a basic insight. Targeting the NSO group is not enough.
UN human rights experts have recently said this Alarm They called it “the increasing use of tenants in cyberspace.”
“It is undeniable that cyber-activities can lead to violations both in armed conflict and in peacetime, and thus have a wide range of rights,” said Jelena Aparak, chair of a UN working group. A statement from the group called on international lawmakers to regulate the industry more effectively in order to protect “the right to life, economic and social rights, freedom of expression, privacy and self-determination.”