Mon. Dec 6th, 2021

Boris Johnson was stuck on Monday in plans to significantly scale down social care support for poorer households in England when he shook off a conservative rebellion against his policies.

The British Prime Minister’s government has been accused by its own backbench MPs of pushing through social care reforms that will hit pensioners with lower value homes, many of whom live in northern parts of England, excessively.

Johnson’s plan was approved in the Commons on Monday night despite a number of Tory MPs warning that the move would hit their less affluent voters in the so-called Red Wall of former Labor seats in the Midlands and Northern England. The government narrowly won the vote with 272 votes to 246, after a number of Tory MPs abstained.

According to the proposals, lower-income households will have to pay part of their care costs for longer before reaching a limit of £ 86,000, after which government support kicks in.

The decision to remove means test support from the government’s calculation of the limit means pensioners with homes that are more expensive can expect to receive more protection against their care costs than those living in cheaper properties.

Before the vote, some senior Tories made clear their opposition to the proposals. Subscribe Twitter, the former Conservative whip Mark Harper said he would vote against the bill, arguing it would harm the less privileged.

Another Tory MP remarked: “The low cost of housing in my area means my voters are not getting the same treatment as those in the south.” He warned that he would “support the government tonight, but not necessarily when [the bill is] back from the Lord ”, adding:“ Those of us who are anxious expect concessions. ”

People with homes worth around £ 100,000, and who have significant social care needs, will be hit the hardest by the plans. But in a speech Monday, Johnson argued that the new proposals were “progressive” and “much more generous than any previous system”.

“So far you have no support unless you have assets of £ 23,000 or less. Now the state is stepping in to help you if you have assets of £ 100,000 and for the first time there is a cost limit that you can be asked to pay, ”he told reporters at the CBI conference in South Shields.

“There is a disregard for housing, so if you and your spouse live in your home, it is left out of consideration when assessing the assets.”

However, the architect of the original blueprint for social care reform warned that less affluent pensioners are “facing real catastrophe” if they are hit with very high care costs. “That was what we were trying to fix,” Sir Andrew Dilnot told the BBC. Today program. “So I think that leaves a significant gap in the overall set of proposals.”

The Conservative party manifesto has promised in the recent election that people will not have to sell their homes to pay for care costs. But Secretary of State Paul Scully could not confirm Monday morning that individuals did not have to sell their property to afford their care. “I can not tell you what individuals are going to do,” he told Sky News.

James White, head of public affairs and campaigns at Alzheimer’s Society, said the limit on healthcare costs was still “alarmingly high” with only one in five people with dementia estimated to ever reach the proposed limit. “The devil is in the details with the exclusion of big costs hitting the less fortunate,” he added.

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *