An international survey of more than 21,000 people in nearly 30 countries found that most people are unable to identify whether their lifestyle decisions are most effective in limiting their carbon footprint.
Yet, irresistible numbers claim they know they need to take personal action to tackle climate change, according to the Financial Times ’exclusive Ipsos Mori survey.
Across the country, the average person surveyed identified regularly avoiding tumble dryers and switching to low-power lightbulbs as a more effective way to reduce individual emissions – not owning a car or choosing a plant-based diet.
In reality, a person can resist the average, using a low-carbon-intensive form instead of driving 2.4 tons In developed countries, carbon dioxide is equivalent to being released into the atmosphere every year. Air drying cloths can save only 0.2 tons of carbon emissions per person per year.
By comparison, the total annual greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide, are about 10.4 tons per capita. In high-income countries, Compared with 12 tons in 2000.
Worldwide greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide, are about 51bn tons. That’s 40 percent more than the 1990 emissions, which were about 35 billion tons.
“Our research shows that the environmental crisis is known around the world,” said Kelly Beaver, Ipsos Mori’s director of public relations. “But people are confused about what steps will have a significant impact on their carbon footprint.”
“People seem to have gotten this message about the importance of recycling, but the reality is this. . . The steps that need to be taken require a big enough sacrifice, ”Beaver added.
The most commonly chosen task as an effective way to limit a person’s greenhouse gas emissions was recycling. Nevertheless, the environmental impact of recycling has less to do with limiting emissions and has more to do with reducing personal waste and eliminating plastic pollution.
Annual emissions savings are estimated to be equivalent to about 0.2 tons of CO2 for the person recycling as much as possible.
As a possible way to reduce personal impact on distributors, one of the most overlooked options by respondents was to choose to have fewer children. A commonly cited estimate for annual emissions assumes that, like other actions, a lesser baby is protected from dwarfing, as mentioned, 582 tons of CO2 equivalent emissions. Environmental research paper Although some educators held this important view in 2017, the Ipsos Mori survey responses prove that young families lack awareness of what effects climate could have.
The division of knowledge of a generation was also highlighted among some of the results. While younger people were more aware of the environmental impact of having less children as well as the benefits of a plant-based diet, the results showed that the older population paid more attention to recycling.
Among the most unexpected findings of the survey, considering misconceptions, nearly 70 percent of respondents believe they know how to minimize their impact on the environment.
The people of Japan were at least confident about how they could reduce their carbon footprint, followed by Russia and Saudi Arabia and South Korea, all countries that are relatively more dependent on fossil fuels.
Follow @ftclimate on Instagram
Where climate change is combined with business, markets and politics. Explore FT’s coverage here