Friday, later A Controversial Legal War On Apple’s alleged monopoly power over the iOS ecosystem, a judge in California tore the tug-of-war rope between Apple and Epic Games. Both sides can claim some victory. Epic Games must pay $ 3.5 million after evading the developer agreement by evading Epic’s payment processor. And Apple must change the rules of its App Store so that developers can use other payment systems – a blow to Apple’s iron grip on the iOS ecosystem.
Although both companies left long trials with their own successes, Apple’s App Store clothes could change forever. Soon, App Store users will have many options for paying developers for their digital products – including some that probably don’t charge these developers commissions.
The বাজার 100 billion global market for mobile gaming is considered the most lucrative frontier for the games industry. The court found that Apple’s share in that market was more than 55 percent. Apple’s iPhone, Apple App Store and Apple iOS operating system: Most of its market power comes from the vertical integration of Apple’s own system. If Apple approves their apps, developers have a platform to reach nearly one billion iPhone users. But in return they will have to use the company’s payment processing services for most of their digital transactions. The point that Epic took so strongly and strongly was that Apple had stopped these purchases at 100 percent commission. Fortnite The developer is called “exclusive tax”.
When it Has filed his case Against Apple last August, Epic claimed that the company had reserved an “unreasonable and illegal” monopoly in violation of the no-confidence law. Apple says developers need to use its payment system to ensure customer safety and ease of use.
Apple’s 100 percent commission is standard, but not critical to its business operations. Maybe, it is not even warranty. Towards the end of 2020, inspired by the lawsuit, Apple launched its small business program, reducing that commission to 15 percent for developers earning less than ১০ 10 million through the App Store. (Other digital marketplaces, including Epic Games, have reduced their commissions by 12 percent.)
While Epic Games has made its crusade for a more open ecosystem as an ideological battle, U.S. District Judge Evon Gonzalez Rogers said in his Friday ruling that the প্রচার 28.7 billion company is in the process of being promoted. “The size of this market explains the purpose of Epic Games to bring this work,” he wrote. “After entering all other video game markets, the mobile gaming market was the next target of Epic Games and it sees Apple as a barrier.” Despite its remarkably high profits, Apple, he found, does not monopolize the mobile gaming market in the eyes of federal anti-trust laws. He echoed Apple’s argument that its tight control over the App Store was important for security and to differentiate iOS from Android’s more licensed-fire environment. “Success is not invalid,” he decides, rejecting Apic’s strong bid to allow other app stores – such as Epic Game Store – to set up stores within iOS.
But when Apple Rogers turned his analysis into California’s unreasonable competition law, Apple didn’t get much either. Under that constitution, Rogers came to the conclusion that Apple must prevent app developers from interacting with users, within or outside the app, about alternative payment methods. That policy, he ruled, was “to suppress illegally[s] Consumer choice by hiding information from consumers “, unfairly protects Apple from price competition.
If you’re having trouble seeing if the same problem can count as a competitor under California law, but not federal antitrust law, you’re not alone. Multiple distrust experts suggested that Rogers’ verdict was logically inconsistent.