The Launched less than a year ago, but Facebook says it is already having trouble complying with the group’s recommendations. The company said it wanted to work with the Oversight Board to “improve the recommendation process”, although it was not immediately clear what those changes might be. However, it suggests that Facebook seeks to change the way it deals with independent organizations created to oversee its content policies.
A. With details of Facebook’s dealings with the Oversight Board, the company notes that it has made significant changes as a result of the Oversight Board’s recommendations. These changes include updates on how it handles And nudity, as well as how it determines “newsworthy” content.
But Facebook is now suggesting that it wants to change the recommendation process. “While we have made these significant changes as a result of the Board’s recommendations, we believe that the current design of the recommendation process may not be the best way to bring about the long-term, structural changes that the Board is forcing us to undertake,” the company wrote in its report. “We are working with the board and our internal teams to explore other ways to improve the potential recommendation process.”
Again, it’s not clear what this means for Facebook’s relationship with the oversight board or group. The Oversight Board did not immediately respond to a request for comment, and during a call with reporters Tuesday, Monica Bickert of Facebook declined to give details about the specific changes the company expects.
In its report, Facebook wrote that “the speed and volume of recommendations do not give us sufficient time to initially evaluate and implement our recommendations.” According to Facebook, most of the board’s recommendations “require more than a dozen people to conduct a feasibility assessment, which we cannot easily complete in 30 days.” The company added that it may take a long time to determine how to integrate policy recommendations into its existing product development.
But while it is not yet clear what will happen as a result of Facebook’s proposed “potential change”, it is significant that the company is already trying to make big changes in how it treats the board. Since its inception, Facebook critics have blasted the oversight board as slightly more than a PR stunt. And while the company says it will abide by individual content decisions made by the board, its broad policy recommendations are where it should be. On the company. The board, for example, criticized Facebook’s decision to impose an “indefinite suspension” on former President Donald Trump, saying the company needed it. Its the rule for politicians.
Facebook has also suggested Oversight boards should be used to monitor their content policy. The company is now claiming that keeping its executives and policy executives in line with the planned process could potentially reduce the impact the board is able to have.
All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you purchase something through one of these links, we can earn an affiliate commission.