Two years ago, a group of teenagers Has filed a petition with the United Nations Said five major emitters are violating their rights. On Monday, a UN committee tasked with reviewing their allegations basically lifted the trophy of their participation and then ruled in favor of the polluting countries.
Cases have been filed against Argentina, Brazil, France, Germany and Turkey, five G20 countries that have signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Greta Thanberg and 15 co-plaintiffs allege that those countries are violating their rights but are using the atmosphere as a carbon dioxide waste dump. Those countries responded by saying that they have a climate plan and they are trying their best, and if the children really want a solution, they should sue each country so that the courts there can handle it.
After two years of hearing, the children did not get back the remedy they wanted. The committee ruled that, yes, climate change is a huge problem and yes, countries around the world are responsible for stopping emissions because of the loss of children. But it said the five countries named after the children had failed to block legal proceedings and that the committee would not count those countries until that happened.
“I have no doubt this ruling will disappoint the committee in the future,” petitioner Alexandria Villasener said in a statement.. “When climate disasters are more severe than they are now, the committee will be deeply regretted for not doing the right thing if given the opportunity. Children responsible for more than 0% of climate crisis children are increasingly at the forefront of the climate crisis Death. Yet, adults have failed to protect us.
“Surprisingly, there is a causal link between the way the committee has acknowledged that the rights of these children have been violated, and that states have a responsibility to reduce that migration,” he said. Prevent children from harming them outside the borders, ”said Scott Gilmore, a counselor at Housefield. “The process itself will take a few years. And we all know there are no years left to reduce emissions. It has to be done immediately.”
Indeed, perhaps the most prominent climate case in U.S. courts Juliana v. United States, A lawsuit filed by children and young people in 2015 that is still going through the court system. During that time, emissions increased uncontrollably in 2020, which was an epidemic. Climate science, meanwhile, shows that carbon pollution needs to start to stop at a rate now About 8% per year, To limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius (2.7 degrees Fahrenheit) each year this decade, the goals outlined in the Paris Agreement. As a result of that “safe” level of global warming there will still be one The world is vastly different Compared to our current, which has warmed about 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit (1 degree Celsius) since pre-industrial times.
“It’s a victory for the committee in advancing human rights law,” said Gilmore. “But again, an abstract victory is an empty victory.”
Although the children had hoped that the outcome of the case might not happen, it would increase the pressure on world leaders next month when they Meet in Glasgow for a climate discussion. It certainly shouldn’t be on the kids, reminding leaders because scientists and other aspects of civil society have been issuing alarming warnings for years. But it seems everything is on deck.
“This decision really highlights the need for climate activism that children have already embraced around the world,” Gilmore said. “This is another example of the fact that the human rights system established by adults is failing the youth of the world.”