Sun. Nov 28th, 2021

For the larger reunification bill, which is still under discussion, the language will subsidize logging on both federal and private lands, as well as subsidize forest biomass energy, wood fire facilities and its production. Cross laminated wood (A type of prefabricated wood panel Used in house construction) Under the title “Innovation of Wood”.

In their letter, the scientists wrote that encouraging more commercial logging and wood-fired power “ignores the advice of hundreds of climate and forest scientists who previously told Congress that these industries significantly increase emissions and exacerbate the climate crisis.”

But not all experts agree. Bob Abt He has been researching Southern forest ecology and economics for over 40 years and is an Emeritus Professor of Natural Resources at North Carolina State University. He says that under the right economic and environmental conditions, the carbon footprint of a wood tree can be smaller than that of coal. Implementing this equation – so that the amount of carbon being burned today for electricity can be offset by future tree growth – has several requirements. First, Abt says, woodland owners need to cut down fast-growing trees, such as pine or mixed wood found in the south. The same process would not work in the forests of New England or the Pacific Northwest, which would take much longer to regenerate.

The second thing is ensuring that landowners who sell timber to pellet companies can keep their land in production as a work forest. Abt says that as the demand for energy from wood increases, so will the price of wood. This will serve as an incentive for timber owners to grow their plants until they are mature, instead of converting the same land into cattle pastures or farmland for seasonal crops, or selling it to housing developers. A 2017 study by researchers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory Expansion of housing tracts and shopping malls has also been shown to endanger those forests. “Urbanization – currently the largest cause of deforestation in the southeastern United States – is more likely to extend to forest landscapes if forest owners lack adequate income opportunities for their timber,” the report said.

If the land from which the bark is collected is later converted to other uses, the carbon that is emitted today by burning trees for electricity will not be recovered by those trees in the future. This means that the carbon neutrality demands of the woodpecker industry may depend on how much North Carolina, Georgia or Mississippi owners can get for their land – something that is difficult to predict for decades to come.

Abt says using forests for energy may not be perfect, but it is a step in the right direction. He said all solutions to the climate crisis need to be on the table. “For wood coming from the south,” he says, “I’m comfortable saying it’s better than coal in most situations.”

In places like the United Kingdom, where there is no internal supply of natural gas, there is a great deal of pressure to burn wood chips. In fact, UK based Drax In 2013, North Yorkshire transformed the island’s largest coal-fired power plant into a pellet-burning plant. It now produces enough electricity for 4 million homes, using wood pellets imported from the United States. According to Ali Lewis, Drax’s head of media and public relations, Drax currently operates 13 pellet plants in the United States and Canada, and is building three more in Arkansas.

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *