Mon. Dec 6th, 2021


Image for an article titled Drunk Driving Tech Mandate on Infrastructure Bill leaves some privacy lawyer nervous

Pictures: Paul J. Richards (Getty Images)

Recently passed 1 trillion Infrastructure Packages are jam-packed Initiatives but scattered among the 17 17 billion in funding for road safety programs are mandates that car manufacturers must implement monitoring System to detect and stop drunk drivers.

Order, first Note This may apply to new vehicles sold by the Associated Press in early 2026. The court instructed some drunk drivers to use a breathalyzer attached to the ignition interlock to start their vehicles, but the technology mentioned in the bill would take that idea much further and be able to “passively monitor” it.[ing] The performance of the driver of a motor vehicle can accurately detect whether the driver may be weak. “

Although the Department of Transportation has yet to use the right technology for the program, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and 17 automakers are working on something. Driver alcohol detection system for safety ( DADSS ) Since 2008. DADSS Hall Exploration Both a breathing and touch-based system for detecting whether a driver’s blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is 0.08% or higher.

The goal of the breath-based system is to measure alcohol readings based on the driver’s breathing in order to distinguish between driver and passenger. The touch-based system will already glow an infrared light through the driver’s finger to measure blood alcohol levels under the skin surface.

Car manufacturers are also working on their own monitoring solutions outside of DADSS. Last year, Volvo was launched Rolling Vehicles with cameras and sensors that can be used to detect signs of a confused or drunk driver. There is also Nissan Advanced It is equipped with a so-called “drunk driving prevention concept car” Sensor-The filled lump claims that it can detect the presence of alcohol in the driver’s sweat. There is also Tesla The beginning Use The camera on the rearview mirrors of the Model 3 and Model Y vehicles is intended to monitor drivers, but it also focuses more on making sure drivers are paying attention when using the driver assistance program.

The stakes around detecting drunk driving couldn’t be higher. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) estimates that about 10,000 people die each year from alcohol-related accidents, accounting for about one-third of all traffic accident deaths in the United States. To sum up, NHTSA estimates that two years ago, one drunk driver died every 52 minutes in the United States.

The new order hit a positive note with some car safety groups, including those against drunken driving that has in the past advocated for more identification technology. “It’s memorable,” said Alex Ote, national president of Drunk Driving Against Mothers To say AP Otte went on to describe the package as “the single most important law” in the group’s history.

At the same time, however, the mandate has raised concerns among security experts and digital rights groups that warn that driver monitoring technology could have an impact on knock-on privacy. A. Letter Sent last year by the American Highway Users Alliance, the agency called for support for NHTSA’s DADSS research program but expressed concern that the technology could potentially infringe on drivers’ civil liberties.

“It is also important that a technology designed to control human behavior protect civil liberties and not be imposed before it becomes clear that the technology works properly – without false positives where law abiding drivers cannot start their vehicles and where false negative legal Drivers who break the law above the alcohol limit rely on technology to make dangerous assumptions that they are safe to dive in, ”the group wrote.

The group has expressed concern about how driver data collection and storage will work and who will own the data. Others, Such as surveillance technology oversight projects (Stop) Albert Fox Kahn, Executive Director, Driver monitoring has expressed concern about the accuracy of the technology and the potential risk of bias.

“Attention tracking technology is error-prone and biased,” Fox Kahn told Gizmodo. “We’ve seen that this type of technology discriminates against people with disabilities when it is used for remote protraction, and it would be just as biased on the road.”

Fox warned that monitoring technology could easily be blocked by disabled drivers.

“We know from other countries that there are ways to reduce drunk driving, such as investing in public transport,” Kahn said. “We should invest in evidence-based systems, not turn our cars into government surveillance equipment.”



Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *