Tue. Dec 7th, 2021

“Surprise: Top American soldier cleanses American soldiers of murder”

It should have been the headline of any story written about the “findings” of a recent “investigation” into the massacre of an Afghan family, including seven children, that was launched in late August by a U.S. “Hellfire” missile has been erased.

Of course, no editor – as far as I can tell – has chosen to tell that simple, blunt truth. Instead, most carried out the usual series of euphemisms surrounding American soldiers from the killings of an Afghan humanitarian worker, Zemari Ahmadi, three of his children, Zamir, 20, Faisal, 16, and Farzad, 13, as well as his cousin, Ahmad, 30, and three of Ahmadi’s nephews, Arwin, seven, Benyamin, six, and Hayat, two and two three-year-old girls, Malika and Somaya.

So, editors have written many headlines like this one to summarize the predictable “conclusions” of a report written by U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Sami Said: “Watchdog finds no misconduct in a wrong Afghan air strike.”

The Pentagon could not have written a more pleasing precision of Lieutenant General Said’s “investigation” into the summary execution of Ahmadi and his family.

The Pentagon is undoubtedly delighted. But it’s important and instructive to deconstruct this apologetic, Pentagon-pleasing headline – for the record – to reveal just how wrong and indecent it is.

First, Lieutenant-General Said would not have paid nanosecond attention to the killings of Ahmadi and his family if the Pentagon could continue to deceive the world about what happened on August 29 in the courtyard of Ahmadi’s house.

Remember, some of the most powerful soldiers in the US “chain of command” immediately trumpeted the ambush as quick, knowledgeable and fair retaliation for a terrorist bombing on the outskirts of the chaotic Kabul airport that mutilated and killed dozens of American soldiers and Afghans has. flight.

The Pentagon assured us that two “high-profile” terrorists had been killed before they could mutilate and kill others and that the carefully planned drone attack, vital, avoided causing any civilian casualties.

U.S. news media quoted an alleged Defense Department official as saying that the main target was “a well-known entity” suspected to be “associated with potential future attacks at the airport” and that the U.S. had located him and “adequately eyes and sufficient knowledge ”to kill him.

Every word was a lie.

Yet for days the Pentagon repeated its lies with the ease of a metronome, even as Afghans insisted that a large, extended family, not terrorists, be deforested and burned. Few believed them, because unlike the “well-placed” Pentagon sources, Afghans apparently could not be trusted.

It was only a week after the New York Times published a story casting doubt on the official, lie-laden version of events that the U.S. military reluctantly admitted to killing a family, not terrorists.

It turns out that America’s just retaliation was Mai Lai with a drone.

In countless dispatches examining his “report” – which would never have been written had it not been for the digging of some skeptical reporters – Lieutenant-General Said is described as an “independent watchdog”.

It made me – and maybe you – laugh.

While I’m sure Lieutenant General Said is a good officer, I’m just as sure he did not become a lieutenant general by defeating his superiors or causing the Pentagon – his employer – any unwelcome grief.

The one-page summary of his “classified” report – filled with perverse evasions and bureaucratic ambiguity – reflects the fact that Lieutenant General Said’s loyalty to the US military is what he has long served, not the truth.

Strangely enough, Lieutenant-General Said chose not to address – in a credible way – how and why top-level American soldiers and officials lied for weeks about who conspired with the vast band of America’s military and intelligence agencies to August to kill.

He left that fatal negligence and fraud untouched.

And, shock of shock, Lieutenant-General Said came to exactly the same verdict that senior U.S. officials parroted for months and only after their litany of lies was revealed: the tearing and killing of 10 Afghans was a well-intentioned but tragic “mistake” made by soldiers who had a “sincere conviction” that more American soldiers would soon be killed.

“Execution errors combined with confirmation bias and communication interruptions have led to deplorable civilian casualties,” Lieutenant General Said wrote.

He added – and I’m paraphrasing here to spare your lieutenant general Said’s fine of bureaucratic double-talk: Hey, the US military was on the verge of losing ground and believed another attack was imminent. Every patriotic soldier involved in this ongoing series of deadly mistakes deserves a breather, right?

Ahmadi was tracked down for hours as he did his daily rounds to pick up and deliver water and food to poor, needy Afghans. Yet, somehow, the technical magic that informs the beehive of analysts populating the U.S. intelligence infrastructure has not once seen Ahmadi perform well, to no avail.

Minutes before the U.S. military fired at Ahmadi and his children, surveillance video allegedly showed a child near where the missile hit.

Lieutenant-General Said’s explanation for this terrible “mistake” is as flawed as it is absurd. “The physical evidence of a child was clear at the 2-minute mark,” he said during a news conference. “But it is 100 percent not obvious; you have to look for it. ”

Well, sir, it was not the work of the American soldier or soldiers who came to Ahmadi that day and went to look: To look beautiful. To keep a close eye on. To see and then to warn or cancel the strike to prevent civilians from being exterminated.

Fueled by anger and the urge to determine what convinced them was a necessary and relentless measure of revenge, it is my “sincere belief” that American soldiers did look, saw, but did not care who killed them, as long as Afghans died. to quickly avenge the murders of their siblings.

Lieutenant General Said and his allies inside and outside the Pentagon will fire anyone who dares to suggest that Ahmadi and his family were not accidentally killed with the same certainty that once announced the killings as a just, eye-for-a-. eye response to terror.

Lieutenant General Said and his wayward allies must answer this question: How do they explain that from 2015 to 2019, according to conservative accounts, the US government made so-called “condolence payments” of more than $ 2 million to 455 Afghan families?

If they really buy the, by this time, perfunctional claim that Ahmadi and his family were killed by “mistake”, please also explain how the US military continues to make “mistake” after “mistake” after “mistake” that led to the deaths of Afghan women, children and men again and again and again and believe after every “mistake” not made sure not to make more “mistakes”?

On October 22, 2020, it was reported that a U.S. air strike targeting a religious school killed 12 children and wounded 14 civilians. Was the death of those 12 children also a “mistake”?

Four days later, a U.S. air strike on the Taliban killed three children and a Taliban commander. Was the death of those three children also a “mistake”?

Like the other, long series of cases in which U.S. soldiers have killed Afghan children, women, and men, we are expected to accept without a doubt Lieutenant-General Said’s finding that not a single U.S. soldier violates any laws, including the rules of war. do not have. the destruction of Ahmadi and his family.

We are expected to no doubt accept the word of this dedicated member of the same US Army who told lie after lie day after day after day about who actually destroyed it when Ahmadi by car with precious jugs at home arrived. water on tow, to be greeted by a bunch of happy and excited children.

We are expected to accept without a doubt that the US military has told all their lies in good, if wrong, faith.

Finally, we are once again expected to accept without a doubt that American soldiers are innocent of killing innocent people.

Zemari Ahmadi, Zamir, Faisal, Farzad, Ahmad, Arwin, Benjamin, Hayat, Malika and Somaya deserve justice. But you, me and their families know they will never get it.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial views.

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *