Wed. Dec 1st, 2021

The letter from Heather Thomas (“Command and control is an outdated office attitude”, 19 November) reflects how the“ work from home ”movement quickly became politicized. It is aggressively driven by a loose alliance of academics, journalists, technology providers and self-interested employees, who use emotional language to demonize any manager who exercises their legal right to question this new mantra.

The political left and unions are also strongly behind it, which is not surprising since it is so clearly in the interest of employees.

What is less clear is whether it serves the interests of organizations and the economy as a whole. While trumpeting the supposed benefits in terms of talent attraction and employee well-being, we have yet to see the impact on cost, productivity, customer service, and organizational cohesion.

Given the significant concern about online GP consultations for the health service and strong student responses to increased online learning, there is clearly another side to this argument that the press and academics prefer to ignore.

While some staff are more productive about working from home, anyone who cares about looking at them on any weekday can see that many others are using their newfound flexibility to do things other than work. Why would they want to give it up?

Whether working from home represents a tectonic shift in work patterns that will help improve the UK’s poor productivity performance, or whether it’s an opportunistic middle – class scam designed to cut five days ‘wages for three or four days’ work to ensure has yet to be determined. saw.

Roy Massey
London NW1, UK

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *