Earlier this year, Spotify was given one Patent For Speech recognition technology Which can potentially recommend music based on your “sensitive condition, gender, age or accent”. Now, a coalition of more than 180 artists and human rights organizations has written on Spotify Letter The company is being asked to be publicly committed to abandoning dystopian technology.
The letter, addressed to Daniel Ekke, CEO of Spotify, claims that the music streaming company will publicly declare that it will “never use, license, sell or monetize the recommended technology.” Signatures for the letter include Talib Cowell, Eve e Eve, Tom Morello of Rage Against Machine, Kimia Dawson of The Moldy Peaches, DIIV, and several other notable musicians.
Spotify’s recommended algorithm is already freakishly accurate, but the patent has added another layer of discipline, as it always involves the listening device. But there is also an argument in the letter The technology discriminates against emotionally manipulative, trance and non-binary individuals, violating privacy and data protection, and exacerbating discrimination in the music industry. The letter reads, “Music should be made for human connection, not to satisfy profit-maximization algorithms.”
“Spotify, even how we feel, how many people are in a room with us, has no valid reason to try to understand our gender, age, or the patent claim to claim the patent claim,” said Isedua Oribavar, U.S. digital rights group. At Access Now’s Policy Analyst Statement. Access now as soon as signed He is also leading the efforts of the alliance. “Millions of people who use Spotify are entitled to respect and privacy, not privacy and surveillance”
This is not the first letter sent to Spotify. Access now first sent a public letter in early April. In her Initial letter, The group called on Spotify to abandon the technology and answer questions about how it planned to protect users’ data. Spotify responded after April 15th With his own letter. The company made it clear that it had “never implemented the technology” and had no plans to do so, arguing that many technology companies do not primarily drive patent innovations as a final product.
“I can assure you that any Spotify product will develop both now and in the future and reflect our commitment to conducting business in a socially responsible way,” wrote Horatio Guterres, Spotify’s chief global affairs and chief legal officer. Horatio also wrote Guterres.
This response was definitely not good enough. The coalition’s letter said the use of such technology was “unacceptable.”” Spotify mentions that “any entity other than the surveillance equipment can gain it if it is set up.”
THe is seeking a public response from Spotify by the coalition May 18. If Spotify responds, it’s unlikely to say more than that already – and the big corporations that are publicly committed to giving up patents for the greater good do nothing. But who knows? Strange things happened.