Tue. Dec 7th, 2021

After Gundogdu learned of the museum’s contract with Shell, he began to reconsider his decision. On November 5, he emailed the curator informing them that due to the museum’s association with Shell, he would no longer provide samples for collection. “I’m trying to raise awareness about climate change and the effects of climate change and how people can be helped to fight this problem,” Gundogdu said. Sending her samples to a science museum would be the opposite of that message, he said.

Museum officials, however, say that shell sponsorship has no effect on how artifacts are collected or displayed. A spokesman for the Science Museum Group said: “We strongly reject the false allegation that our curators are an expert, independent, and thoroughly interfere with their important role. The spokesperson added that the museum retains full editorial control over the contents of its exhibits and galleries and would not agree to any relationship that hinders the pursuit of its mission in collecting material or producing exhibitions.

“Curators often discuss current research with scientists to help identify suitable items for acquisition. This is the beginning of a long process that involves thorough internal discussion and research before a formal acquisition,” said Tilly Blyth, head and chief curator at the Science Museum’s collection. . “We respect the right of any person to decide whether they wish to cooperate with us by donating items to the National Collection.”

Shell also denies that sponsorship of the Climate Change Exhibition undermines the independence of science museums. “We fully respect the independence of the museum. This is why it is an exhibition on carbon capture and why we have supported it. Debate and discussion – among those who see it – is essential, “said a spokesman for Shell. 1.38 billion Metric tons are equivalent to carbon dioxide – more than four times Annual emissions across the UK. According to the environment Charity Client Earth, The planned emissions of shale between 2018 and 2030 will account for about 1.6 percent of the total global carbon budget, the amount of carbon that can be emitted into the atmosphere by keeping global warming below 1.5 degrees Celsius.

The science museum has been embroiled in multiple controversies surrounding sponsorship from Shell for its future planet show, which will run until September 2022. The exhibition focuses on technology Carbon capture And Planting trees– That can be accustomed Removal of carbon dioxide From the atmosphere, however, sponsorship has been widely criticized for greenwashing Shell’s significant contribution to the climate crisis. Fossil fuels are the most important contributor to global warming and burning.

In September, the Science Museum said it would remove a student-made placard from the exhibition in March 2019 for a climate protest. The placard was collected after a march in London where an estimated 10,000 young people gathered to protest the government’s inaction on climate change. Change. In response, it was decided to remove the placard Open letter From the UK Student Climate Network, who asked for the placard to be removed because the young people who donated it were not made aware of Shell’s sponsorship.

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *