Since the Trump administration intentionally intends to build “animal immunity” with this permission Coronavirus To spread the word, the big scientific firms are condemning a plan that they say is deadly and virtually impossible.
That plan, Bedding A controversial document called the “Great Barrington Declaration” calls on three scientists to protect only “weak” people and allow everyone else to be infected with COID-19. The authors discussed the strategy in a meeting with the top two White House officials last week.
This week, Anthony Fawcett, the top U.S. health official, head of the World Health Organization, and more than a dozen groups representing thousands of infectious diseases and public health experts have returned with one official condemnation after another.
“We just want to look at this square and say it’s stupid,” said Foussi, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Told ABC News Thursday.
“Never in the history of public health has animal immunity been used as a response to an outbreak, let alone an epidemic. It’s scientifically and ethically problematic, “said David Cook, chief of The Christian Science Monitor’s Washington bureau. WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Gherbayass Monday.
And on Wednesday, a team of 80 researchers Tell the idea In a letter published in the high-profile medical journal The Lancet, “a dangerous contempt is unsupported by scientific evidence.”
The Great Barrington DeclarationPublished on a website sponsored by a Libertarian think tank, the argument is that the coronavirus is not so dangerous to many people, so “those who are not weak should be allowed to resume life as normal immediately.” The letter “expresses serious concern about the harmful physical and mental health effects of existing COVID-19 policies” and calls for the resumption of private lessons, the reopening of restaurants and businesses, and the resumption of large gatherings such as concerts and sports events.
So far, the letter has been signed by more than 35,000 self-identified scientists and physicians – though Some signatoriesSuch as “Dr. “Johnny Klass” and “Professor Komnick Dummings” were identified as plain duplicates. All signatures identified were later made private.
The architects of the document are a trio of scientists from Harvard, Stanford and Oxford Universities, Some of those Done I have been telling policy makers for months The virus is not that deadly. Last week they met with Alex Azhar, secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, and Scott Atlas, a Stanford neurodegenerative of the White House Coronavirus Task Force.
Both expressed support for the views of scientists. Afterwards, Azar tweeted that they had “heard a strong reinforcement of the Trump administration’s aggressive approach to protecting the weak when opening schools and workplaces.” And in a call to the White House on Monday, unnamed senior administration officials referred to the Great Barrington Declaration to reporters. “We are not approving any plans,” an official said. According to the Washington Post. “The plan supports the President’s policy for several months.”
The Great Barrington Declaration is igniting months of public interest as an epidemic that the federal government has failed to control. More than 216,000 Americans have died. Life is flooded in virtually every sense: massive job losses, large and small gatherings and businesses, schools and restaurants are closed. Data indicate that the epidemic is affecting the health of non-Kavid-19: people are turning it off Appears for cancer And Treatment for stroke, And there are problems with more adults Mental health and substance abuse.
The world is waiting for such a vaccine, “Epidemic fatigue”Is spreading in the United States and elsewhere. In the UK, where the Covid-19 case is on the rise again, lawyers are fighting public resistance to try a second round. Lockdown system.
But the mainstream scientific community says abandoning the virus is not an acceptable solution to protect healthy people.
Up to 90% Of the US population Remains sensitive According to recent CDC estimates, the virus. Health experts have expressed concern that the lack of a vaccine could lead to non-spread of the virus among healthy people. Hospitalized, And kill many of them, not to mention overwhelming the healthcare system. Even young, healthy people die Relatively low rate, They could The virus still infects at-risk groups Or join “Long-haired”Who endure exhausting symptoms after months. There is no guarantee that survivors will be immune forever: no one knows how long immunity lasts, and it has. Reconstruction of a few coins.
The experts added that it would be “impossible” to separate the millions of “weak” Americans who are older. There is the previous condition, Or Live in a multi-storey family. The Great Barrington Declaration proposes to separate these groups from the rest of society but provides no plan for how this can be done.
The head of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the head of the HIV Medicine Association said, “It is inappropriate, irresponsible and irresponsible to promote the concept of immunity involved in the recently published documents in response to the COVID-19 epidemic,” which has more than 12,000 infectious diseases Representing experts, In a statement Wednesday.
In a joint statement on Wednesday. 14 prominent public health organizations It was declared that “the advice given in the Great Barrington Declaration is not based on science” and that they “sacrifice their lives unforgettably and unconditionally.”
“The declaration is not a strategy, it is a political statement,” wrote groups including the American Public Health Association, the Association of Public Health Laboratories and the Johns Hopkins Center for Public Security. “It ignores good public health skills. It preys on desperate populations. We need to focus on how to manage this epidemic safely, responsibly and equitably, rather than selling the expected false hope. “
And a group of 70 researchers opposed the Great Barrington Declaration with an open letter of its own. Memoirs of John Snow, Named after the nineteenth-century physician who found the source of the cholera epidemic in London and is considered one of the founders of modern epidemiology.
The signatories to the letter acknowledged that there was “widespread frustration and declining confidence” in the face of ongoing sanctions in countries that failed to adopt “adequate provisions to manage the epidemic and its social impact.”
The letter argued that the letter was signed by 50 people led by 30 researchers and 50 people from a wide range of disciplines in public health, epidemiology, medicine, health policy and other disciplines. Arguments were made, but society could not allow the virus to spread among this infected population.
They wrote that measures such as extensive testing and contact detection need to be implemented, and that they must be supported by financial and social programs that stimulate community response and address the imperfections widened by the epidemic, “they wrote. Referred to as countries that have shown that the infection can be controlled.
“The evidence is very clear: the best way to protect our societies and economies until safe and effective vaccines and therapeutics arrive in the coming months is to control the community control of COVID-19,” they wrote.
“We cannot carry out responses that reduce an effective response; It is important for us to work on the basis of evidence. “