The Pentagon surveyed Americans without a warrant, the senator said


The senator said the Pentagon is surveying Americans with warrants.

Pictures: Staff / AFP

The Pentagon recently indicated to a U.S. senator that it was buying Americans’ cars, phones, and online metadata access, or how it could not disclose it publicly. Anyway Doing so, it does not violate the Fourth Amendment and does not require a warrant to do so.

Sen. Ron Wadden (D-OR) is trying to get to the bottom of how and why the Department of Defense collects data through the private sector. Multiple media reports have shown that agencies like it and then Wyden becomes interested. Department of Homeland Security, US Special Forces, And, comfortably, an agency Dr. was responsible for the drone attack, Leaning to the private sector to buy data from all generic applications. In January, the defense intelligence agency admitted Purchase access to location data US based phone

As he began to look for it, Weiden was obviously involved in running behind the Pentagon, during which time he learned a few things about the agency’s data collection practice. On Thursday, Wyden sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III asking the top defense official to inform him of information recently shared in his office with the American public. That letter, First report by Vice News And shared with Gizmodo, U.S. Congressman has publicly called on Austin to “disclose information about the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DOD) warrantless surveillance.” You can read the whole letter Here.

Wyden had earlier in February sent a letter to the Under-Secretary of Intelligence and Security requesting information on how to procure federal data. The DOD initially responded to Wyden’s letter on March 3, but answered three of the eight questions he asked. Then, on April 21, the agency sent another letter to answer the remaining questions, but designated one answer as “classified” and the rest as “controlled incoherent information.” A surname for data “Need for protection or control of publicity.”

The bottom line is that most of the Pentagon’s explanations of how the data is being collected or how it is being done will not be made public, at least for now. Weiden’s staff, including security clearances, allowed certain members to view more sensitive answers, but “some of the answers provided by the DOD were given in a form that means Weiden’s office cannot clarify the legal oversight.” Vice Report.

Apparently prohibited questions requested information about concerns at Weiden’s office or how the information is being collected and specified by which agencies. Questions such as: “Are any DOD components other than the DIA purchased and used without phone court location data from phones located in the United States? If yes, please identify any components” or: “Any DOD components from automobile telematics systems in the United States (I.e. Internet Connected Vehicle) court order is being purchased and used without location data? If yes, please identify any components. “”

Part of the answers, which can be shared publicly, sues why the Department of Defense is doing what is fair. Widen’s office wanted “a copy of the legal analysis supporting DOD’s theory about his data collection practice.” The company responded:

In general, the defense intelligence component enables the conduct of authorized intelligence activities (especially foreign intelligence and counter-terrorism activities) to collect and retain information, subject to applicable laws, regulations and policies, including the Fourth Amendment. Carpenter Opinions and other relevant case laws) and Attorney General-approved procedures in DODM 5240.01. We understand that the DIA has already provided Senator Weidon’s staff with a document that states the DIA’s legal decisions in question. We have no other analysis to answer this question.

Civil rights groups have questioned these practices and whether the government is violating them. Fourth AmendmentWhich protects Americans from “unreasonable searches and interceptions.” Wyden recently proposed “The Fourth Amendment is not a sales law“Which would legally prohibit” termination of court by a government agency buying Americans’ data “and prohibit the collection of data without this warrant, Vice Report.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *