Pictures: Stefan Schweitz (Getty Images)
There is a reason for this No one falls Tucked away the little terms of the service tab Below any website: tHey Too long, Very full Terminology, And Very impenetrable Anyone without a law degree is annoyed to try to understand.
Now, a bipartisan trio of lawmakers wants to change that. U.S. Representative Laurie Trahan (D-MA), including U.S. Sense. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Ben Ray Luzan (D-NM) Announcement A new bSick Thursday that, if passed, would be mandatory for major businesses to create a simple and schematic summary of their ToS pages that are designed to be read. Regular people Instead of the whole legal party. They call it the “Terms of Service Labeling, Design and Readability Act” or TLDR Act, abbreviated (yes, really).
In particular, TLDR will require this summary Outline the type of consumer information being collected on a given site And details about whether it is actually necessary to collect that data first. Companies will be asked to draw a graphic diagram to show how their data is being shared with certain third parties and what legal liability for it. The person used The site. On top of that, the site will Users need to pay They know how to delete their personal The site is collecting data and give instructions on how to do it. The companies Also have to List Any reports that the site has infringed information Experienced For the past three years, and published And an overview of recent changes to ToS.
Basically, This is short and simple The ToS version of a site may not be as long as the indefinite legal issues you need to read now, but don’t expect this To be Brief
In order for this order to take effect, companies must also write these brief summaries Machine readable text, So that “advocates and browser extension developers” (and possibly anyone else) can analyze the differences between different companies. ‘ Terms If any site is caught on the scale The bill allows the Federal Trade Commission to impose fines under its current “unjust or fraudulent act or practice” rule, if anything secret is added to it. State AGs They can also bring their own actions “on behalf of at least 1,000 affected residentsTate. “
Like most bills, TLDR is something that sounds good in theory but probably will A complete Mess in practice. Website ts ermsMay be service Impossible to read, but privacy pThe policy is Just as bad, And discuss your data in general and how it is handled in more detail From something else ToS. But privacy policies are not addressed in this bill, and there are no different flavors of “anonymous data” that these companies can freely collect, although that data Usually sensitive Something like your address or phone number.
T.He tl;Dr. of TLDR: IIt’s not great! It only deals with a narrow slice of data sites collected on you Across the web, and against your will, they give out lots of data mining to continue. And even if this bill By Go ahead in Congress যা whatever, let’s be real Probably not-But going up against it Current patchwork Technical privacy laws that vary by state. It is already going to butt up against an FTC Overwhelmed With his current responsibilities and That’s right Some have lost key technicians that would make such supervision possible.
Thanks, even if cAngres will not give us the ToS summary we deserve, Already there A website That makes this bill aim almost everything.