Fri. Dec 3rd, 2021

Google has managed to avoid this risk Case Nearly 5.4 million iPhone users in the UK after violating privacy. The UK Supreme Court has ruled that it cannot allow the search giant to wear a US-style class action suit after deliberately creating a workout to track safari users. The Judgment, Read by Lord Leggett, focused on procedural issues, such as the intersection between Google in the United States and data protection laws in the United Kingdom. More importantly, however, there was the issue of “loss” and the fact that the claimants – led by consumer rights champion Richard Lloyd – did not establish that there was any material damage caused by Google’s solution.

The story began with Lloyd in 2017, and many others formed a group called “Google You Owe Us” to try to sue the company. It alleges that Google violated UK law by collecting data on iPhone users between June 2011 and February 2012. The issue is based on the fact that Google deliberately created a solution to gain access to data that it would not otherwise have been entitled to. Lloyd and the crew Lost in the High CourtBut this was the initial decision UK Court of Appeals dismisses, Says Google is in a position to sue for intentional misuse of personal data without consent.

US-style class action cases are not common or even Really one thing Under UK law, however, it is possible for a large group of litigants to take joint action. Lloyd and his colleagues were trying to establish that Google’s tracking is inherently harmful, and that a standard level of compensation can be calculated through extensions. This was the fact that the Supreme Court most clearly rejected – saying that a set of statistics (reported as £ 750 (about $ 1,000) per affected user)) was not a fair remedy.

Of David Barker Pinsent mason – The firm hired by Google to fight the lawsuit – writes that the decision supports the notion that compensation can only be sought for the actual damage. And it was, simply put, that Google’s personal data aggregation was insufficient for real-world loss or emotional distress. Richard Lloyd, who brought the action, said Sky News That he was “bitterly disappointed” that the court had “failed to do enough to protect the public from law-breaking Google and other big tech companies.” And that this judgment is, in effect, a blank check for large technology companies so that user data can be misused without fear of reprisals. He added that it was time for government leaders to take action and legislate to stop the misuse of personal information.

All products offered by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you purchase something through one of these links, we may receive an approved commission.

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *