Twitter has told the Indian government that it will not restrict the accounts of journalists, activists and politicians, despite receiving orders from the country’s federal government. This, however, is blocking an unspecified account that does not fall into these categories to be viewable internally in the country.
In this Blog post The agency said in a statement on Tuesday that although it wanted to block some of the accounts the Indian government wanted to block, it would not block others because doing so would violate free speech.
“Because we do not believe that the steps we have been instructed to take are consistent with Indian law, and in compliance with our principles of safe speech and freedom of expression, we have not taken any action on the accounts of new media entities, journalists, activists and politicians.” “To do so, we believe, would violate their fundamental right to freedom of expression under Indian law,” the blog post said.
The Twitter post came in the midst of a fight with the Indian government, a big market for the company over limiting accounts on the platform. Earlier this month, the company Limited People in India are not seeing more than 250 accounts in the country after receiving urgent legal orders from the Indian Ministry of Information Technology. Among the blocked accounts was an investigative news magazine called Caravan; Critics of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi; And the accounts are tweeting in support of a month-long farmers ’protest across the country that is brightening the country.
But Twitter recovered the accounts six hours later, arguing with the Indian government that the accounts spoke for free and that was noticeable. In response, the government Threatens Twitter officials were fined and sentenced to seven years in prison for violating the order.
The standoff with the Indian government has put Twitter on one Tough spot. Blocking the accounts would mean a crackdown on dissent, freedom of speech and journalism by India’s growing dictatorship. But disobeying the government means risking legal consequences.
In Blog post Twitter, released on Tuesday, said it had taken additional steps to ban hashtags with malicious content from the platform, which the government feared would lead to real world violence in the protests and permanently suspend more than 500 accounts for violating Twitter rules.
But Post It also hints that Twitter is trying to seek legal redress to restore some of the accounts it had restricted in the country.
“We will support the right to express opinions on behalf of the people we serve and are actively seeking alternatives under Indian law,” Twitter wrote, “for Twitter and the accounts that have been affected.” Committed to security, and strongly believe that tweets should flow. “