Nowadays the use of internet data is skyrocketing, no wonder.
In 2020, the average amount of Internet data usage for a single family was 483 GB per month. By the end of this year, the average broadband cost per household could reach 600-650 GB per month, according to OpenVault CEO Mark Trudeau, A broadband data and analysis solutions company. It is understood that millions of people were working from home to school or studying during the epidemic so the use of broadband has increased dramatically.
But there is a huge problem. If America continues to keep pace with domestic broadband demand and remains competitive with other countries with stronger Internet infrastructure, it should stop subsidizing large Internet service providers and instead invest in government-run and local networks.
The Beadon administration has A পরিকল্পনা 100 billion plan to stop the digital divide is a great one. The plan promises every American, especially more than 35% of rural Americans, a lack of high-speed Internet, affordable, reliable, and fast broadband. According to Axios, The plan will prioritize spending on government-operated or non-profit networks such as municipal broadband or electrical co-ops.
Unlike large ISPs such as AT&T, Comcast, and Charter, these small, local suppliers do not have to look to shareholders to monitor short-term investments – this is a big reason why large companies work harder to replace old DSL lines year after year. Why not provide cable or fiber line, or more last-mile service. (You shouldn’t find one Newspaper 10,000 newspaper advertisements Just get it & t to connect the last mile service to your home))
Investors will get their money back In a short time If ISPs only focus on improving and upgrading Internet infrastructure in densely populated areas. This allows large ISPs to maintain unilateral control over those areas, Forcing customers to use their services. It does not help ban 22 state roadblocks or completely municipal broadband, which not only creates broadband competition but It will also reduce the cost of monthly internet plans.
President Biden’s plan is to look at other ways to reduce the cost of Internet services without continuing to subsidize ISPs so that they charge consumers less. Existing Connect America Fund (CAF), For example, it is not funded by ISPs but is regularly funded by all taxpayers and appears as a fee on phone and internet bills. And According to the Institute of Technology PolicyPublic service subsidies such as CAF have little effect on increasing broadband coverage in rural areas.
“Expect better results from public services and the FCC should continue to promote new and optimal ways to promote coverage so that subsidized customers are not just rural ISPs,” TPI wrote.
Many lawmakers and big ISPs like the current status quo for obvious reasons. They receive subsidies and can continue through programs such as free programs from the FCC RDFAlthough some Major telecoms unable to meet agreed-upon deadline for broadband rollout, And they get locked out of the competition.
Surprisingly, Republican lawmakers and lobbyists are vehemently opposed to Biden’s plan. Michael Powell, chief executive officer of the Internet and Television Association (NCTA) and former Republican chairman of the Federal Communications Commission from 1997 to 2005. Recently told Axis He believed that “the private sector and profit motives were internally dissatisfied with the idea that the idea was ‘surprisingly Soviet’ and that the government’s belief in building and operating a nationwide broadband network was” unfounded. “Some of the NCTA’s core values It seems like an embarrassment to consider Digital partitioning off And maintaining a Open internet. But then again NCTA In 2020, he received grants from various individuals associated with large privately owned ISPs.
Creating state-run broadband, or even investing in last-mile fiber infrastructure across the country, will “create jobs in both urban and rural areas and provide a clear, real benefit to millions of Americans.” Council on Foreign Relations. CFR not only supports Biden’s Internet plan, but the company believes that the Internet should be considered a utility.
“High-speed, fiber-based Internet access lines, like electricity, water and sewerage services, should be considered a utility that needs to be connected to every home. Once it is created, the network should be operated under an open access policy, supervised and implemented by the government, allowing any ISP to access the infrastructure to provide services at a reasonable, non-linear price, ”the CFR said.
Recent research from reviews.com It has been shown that 40.2% of consumers will consider switching to municipal broadband immediately if it is available in their location. Another 10.9% of consumers said they would switch, and 29.3% said they would at least try. It is clear people want and want more affordable and more equitable access to the Internet. When The early adopters of SpaceX’s Starlink are having a great experience With floating satellite internet service, Starlink is probably the most suitable for rural Americans, not urbanites. We need a nationwide, like the one described in Biden’s plan to ensure that the United States stops the digital divide. Keeps pace with other countries.