Why a more feminist internet would be good for everyone


“My first rape and death threat came in 2005,” she says. Farrell wrote a blog post criticizing the U.S. response to Hurricane Katrina as racist and subsequently abused. Since then, he says, the situation has gotten worse: “A decade or so ago, you had to say something that attracted Aprobrium. That’s not the case now. Now it’s every day. He’s very careful about what services he uses.” Is and never care to share his position online.

However, death threats and online abuse are not the only online problems that inadvertently affect women. There are also less obvious disadvantages like algorithmic inequality. For example, try Google the terms “school boy” and “school girl”. Figure results for boys are mostly innocent, whereas girls ’results are dominated by sexual imagery. Google ranks these results according to the image recognition algorithm based on what image is displayed on a web page, its alt text or caption, and what it contains. Bias has entered through two routes: image recognition algorithms themselves have been trained on sexist images and captions from the Internet, and web pages and talking captions about women have become entangled by the vast sexuality that has developed over the decades online. In short, the Internet is a self-powered Misogini machine.

Over the years, Facebook has trained its machine-learning systems Spot And scrubs any image that harms sexuality or nudity but these algorithms are repeatedly overly alous jealous, its photos have been censored Plus size women, Or women Breastfeeding It doesn’t lose to functional leaders what it did while allowing their children’s organization to run hate speech on its platform at the same time. “It happened when you let the Silicon Valley Bros. set the rules,” said Carolina Array, an algorithmic proponent of the City of London.

How we got here

For this story I have spoken to every woman she has faced more and more harassment in recent years. One possible culprit is the design of social media platforms and especially their algorithmic underpinnings.

In the early days of the web, technology companies made a choice that their services would be supported mostly by advertising. We weren’t just given the option to subscribe to Google, Facebook or Twitter. Instead, the money these companies want is eyeballs, clicks, and comments, all of which they use to create data and use to market their users to real customers: advertisers.

“Platforms try to maximize excitement-growth through algorithms that drive more clicks – really,” Farrell says. Aspired, it is said in words: “Hate makes money” “Facebook Profit 2020 29 billion in 2020.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *