Why can’t the airport be turned into a giant solar farm?


Next time If you are looking for an aircraft window during takeoff or landing, give the airport a scan. You will see hangers and other support buildings and of course terminals. But in most cases you will see lots of empty space. Aircraft, as many aeronautical engineers have referred to as empty spaces, have obvious reasons, including not going with trees.

Do you know what open space is like? Solar panels, which are not just trees, hate the shadows of tall buildings. So why aren’t we airing our airports – dedicated spaces that can’t be used for anything other than the air travel business with solar arrays? Well, it turns out that airports not only have a lot of vacancies, they also have a lot of rules.

But let’s talk about their potential first. New research coming out of Australia shows just how effective it will be to further develop the country’s 21 airports. The researchers scanned satellite images of airports for open roof space, where solar panels best avoid shadows and found a total of 2.6161 square kilometers or 1 square mile of usable area.

For comparison, they also scanned satellite images and found 17,000 residential solar panels in the town of Bendigo, just north of Melbourne, South Australia. The researchers calculated that airports could potentially produce 10 times the amount of solar energy because of these 17,000 residential panels এটি that’s enough to power 136,000 homes. Perth Airport alone will produce twice as much as Bendigo. (Perth is very sunny, and there are lots of big buildings at the airport.) They also calculated that scrolling all 21 airports would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 152 kilotons per year, the equivalent of pulling 71,000 passenger cars off the road.

With their plenty of sunshine, the Australians are sitting with the same power as the gold mine; Large swaths of empty roof space at airports provide an opportunity to centralize solar power generation. Installing panels in homes is great – and no one is saying we should stop, because we need all the solar energy we can get. Commercial panels, however, are larger and more efficient, so they can generate More power. Also, residential roofs come in all shapes and sizes, making it more difficult to work than commercial roofs that are usually flat. Chan Sun, a geophysical scientist at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology, said, “Just imagine that the new related author would install the labor in different sizes of residential buildings.” Paper Modeling description Journal of Building Engineering. “Compare this to flat-roofed, low-rise airport buildings.”

Solarizing airports could potentially power the airport And Even export energy. “Not only can they be self-sufficient, there may be extra electricity that can be transmitted to the grid to supply the surrounding area,” Sun says.

Paneling these roofs may be effective but it still won’t be easy. In the United States, for example, the federal aviation administration needs to prove to airport officials that their new panels will not flash, they will turn the sunlight on the tower in the eyes of pilots and air traffic controllers. (That Should not be Be a problem, thanks to the covers of modern solar panels, but it still needs to be considered in the planning of officials)) The FAA also wants to make sure that the panels will not interfere with radar communications at the airport.

Scott Morrisy, senior vice president at Denver International Airport, said the existing roof panels could require a reconstruction to be mounted, which would further increase costs. But when new structures are built or terminals are expanded, solar power can be engineered right into the plan. “It simply came to our notice then Design And integrating solar into that building makes it much more economical than going back and trying to rebuild old buildings, ”Morrissey said.



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *