Tue. Oct 19th, 2021


“It was not appropriate for Facebook to impose indefinite and indefinite suspensions indefinitely,” The decision falls. Facebook needs to review the matter itself, the board wrote, and “determine and justify a proportional response that is consistent with the rules applied to other users of a platform.” They have set a deadline of six months from now, at which point we will definitely do one more news cycle about Trump’s presence on social media.

Over the years, Trump has been at the center of a focus loop that has been both highly consequential and meaningless; The head of state used his personal Twitter account to expand extremist content, to intervene and draw public attention, to retrieve bomb memes, to spread dangerous conspiracy theories, and to speak directly to followers who eventually agreed. Capital storm In an attempt to overturn an election, they falsely believed that it had been stolen.

For years, organizations such as Facebook and Twitter have refrained from interfering with Trump’s social media posts, claiming that their “newsworthyness” should protect him even when he violated platform rules regarding abuse or disorder. This began to change during the Covid epidemic, as Trump used his platform to repeatedly spread misinformation about both the vote and the virus. Over the summer, Twitter began adding “fact checks” to Trump’s rule-breaking tweets, which angered the president so much that he threatened to repeal Article 230, a rule that protects many Internet companies from liability for what they do with their services.

But while Trump has been away from major social media platforms forever, the cycle has been established. Trump will continue to make statements, and his supporters will share them, and whether he stays on social media will be overshadowed by the media. And the focus of what he has been for so long will continue to be without him, as is the underlying structure that makes Trump’s influential presence on social media possible.

This is “the worst case scenario for Facebook, which put this issue together.”

Joan Donvan, Harvard Schreinstein Center for Media, Politics and Public Policy

Permanently banning Trump from Facebook will put him on the side of these networks. Hudney Phillips, an assistant professor at Syracuse University who studies media literacy and chaos, commented that focusing so much on the platform’s decision was their ultimate deviation. Trump’s social media success has come from platforms regionally, but also from the “economic, political, and social hegemony” that encouraged Trump and will promote the next Trump to come forward.

“Trump’s accounts are tiring because they take us away from the deeper issues we had to deal with yesterday,” Phillips said. The oversight board’s decision was hyped in such a way that a big referendum on how Facebook balances freedom of speech and security: instead, it was an indecisive decision that changed little about why we came here in the first place.

Joan Donvan, director of research for politics and politics at Harvard Kennedy School’s Harvard Kennedy Center, argued that the board itself was essentially a media campaign. The board’s indecisive decision means Facebook has been tasked with deciding how to enforce its own policy, which is basically “the worst case scenario for Facebook, which put the issue together,” he said. “They had a job.”

“When it comes to Facebook, you have to keep in mind that Facebook is not a place where people post messages,” Donvan said. “It effectively gives you the ability to have your own television station”, with a network of related pages and accounts that can quickly add content to millions of viewers. Facebook is an organizational tool and broadcast network in one, and its power in that capacity is regularly used for good and bad.



Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *