Sat. Jan 22nd, 2022

A year later, Chen was arrested on suspicion of federal grant fraud and publicly charged with allegiance to the United States – a charge usually leveled at espionage cases, not grant fraud, as Chen’s defense team noted. Effort To formally approve the statement to the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Chen was eventually charged with wire fraud, making false statements and failing to submit a report to a foreign bank account.

But the key issue in the lawsuit was that the nanotechnologist had published contracts, appointments and awards from the People’s Republic of China, including a Chinese talent program and more than $ 19 million in federal grant funding from the Chinese government. Department of Energy.

This question became less important when an official from the Department of Energy confirmed the need for a grant in 2017, when Chen submitted His appeal did not stipulate that he must publish a post in China, but that publication would not affect his donations, such as the Wall Street Journal. First report.

At the heart of the fraud allegations – the 25 million – MIT was intended to support a new collaborative research center at China’s Southern University of Science and Technology, instead of Chen. “Although Professor Chen is the director of the inaugural MIT faculty, this is not a personal collaboration; It’s a departmental, backed by the institute, “said MIT President Rafael Reif Letter To the MIT community last year.

As one of the most prominent scientists charged under the initiative, Chen’s case has received widespread attention. MIT faculty members wrote one Open letter Supporting scholars who also reflect the wider concerns of the academic community about the criminalization of standard academic activity. “In many cases, the allegation against the gang chain is an allegation against all of us, an insult to any citizen who evaluates science and scientific initiative,” they wrote.

What then?

While all of Chen’s allegations have been confirmed, six more research integrity cases are pending. Four are scheduled to go to trial later this spring. In the meantime, scientific associations, civil rights organizations, legislators and Even ex-officers are involved in shaping the program Either calling for an end to the program or at least targeting academics.

The judiciary is “reviewing our approach to the threat posed by the PRC government,” said Winn Hornbuckle, a spokesman for the judiciary. MIT Technology Review In an email, “We look forward to completing the review and providing additional information next week.” He referred questions about Chen’s case to the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Boston, which has not yet responded to a request for comment.

Meanwhile, on January 4, the White House Office of Science and Technology released the policy Updated guide Strengthening American research and development protection against foreign interference, including additional details required for disclosure to major investigators.

For Chen, “he looks forward to resolving the criminal case as soon as possible,” his attorney, Robert Fisher, told MIT Technology Review.

Additional report by Jess Aloe.

Source link

By admin

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *